30
Nov

Another IRS Levy

   Posted by: BobMcNeil   in IRS

Despite my repeated notices and submission of proof that I have no Federal income tax liability, Roger Caris, IRS Revenue Officer, recently sent another levy to one of my clients. The levy requires the client to hand over 100% of any money owed me to the IRS for an alleged liability for the year 2002.

Fortunately, I have no outstanding balance due from the client, so the IRS will get nothing.

As you read the levy, I draw your attention to Page 2 “Excerpts from the Internal Revenue Code”. Notice that all of the Sections referenced begin with Paragraph (a), except for Section 6331 Levy and Distraint, which begins with Paragraph (b).

Why would the IRS leave out Paragraph (a)?

Read for yourself:

Sec. 6331. Levy and Distraint

-STATUTE-
(a) Authority of Secretary
If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.

I know for a fact that I am not an “officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia”.

I also know for a fact that, given the taxing clauses of the U.S. Constitution, numerous Supreme Court rulings, as well as the wording of the Internal Revenue Code, I have no federal income tax liability.

In addition, please note that the levy has no OMB control number, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, and is therefore invalid.

This is further proof that Mr. Caris continues to commit fraud against me in attempting to collect a non-existent tax liability.

Click on the following link for information relevant to this blog:
083 IRS Notice of Levy Nov 16 2007 REDACTED

No direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court rulings.

Knowledge is power. Educate yourselves.

This entry was posted on Friday, November 30th, 2007 at 3:12 am and is filed under IRS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment