22
Aug

Bill Benson – Contempt Proceedings

   Posted by: BobMcNeil   in IRS

Bob
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

—- Original Message —–
*From:* Jeffrey A. Dickstein <mailto:[email protected]>
*To:* Bill Benson <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Friday, August 21, 2009 1:19 PM
*Subject:* Benson Update

PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO YOUR MAILING LIST

——————-

The government’s war against Bill Benson has once again escalated.  On Aug. 19, the government filed a Motion for an Order to Show Cause in re contempt to have Bill once again sent to jail. It is attached hereto as Doc. 194.

I just filed our opposition, Doc. 196.

A hearing is scheduled in the District Court for September 2, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.

After the 7th Circuit denied Benson’s appeal, the case was remanded to the district court with instructions for the court to enter an order compelling Bill to provide the names and addresses of those who obtained his proof that the 16th Amendment was not ratified.

The government filed a motion for an order of immunity to remove Bill’s 5th Amendment objection to providing the documents. The Court granted the immunity and ordered Bill to provide the information.

Bill filed a declaration stating he did not have the information, as it was on a computer that died and he threw it out.

The government does not believe Bill and is seeking to have him held in contempt, and imprisoned.

The government’s subversion of the facts to support its blatantly false allegations would be hilarious if it weren’t so dangerous. It once again proves how little ethics some people in government positions of authority have.

Regarding the petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court in Bill’s case, I am on the eighth revision, and still have a long way to go. General info on the Petition can be found here http://www.techlawjournal.com/glossary/legal/certiorari.htm

We are still in need of donations; please consider making one by going to http://jeffdickstein.com/donate.aspx

Thank you,

Jeffrey A. Dickstein
Attorney at Law
500 W. Bradley Rd., C-208
Fox Point, WI 53217
(414) 446-4264
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://jeffdickstein.com <http://jeffdickstein.com/>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Click on the following link for more information about the Benson case:

Also, listen to Jeff Dickstein discuss the case

http://ram-v-irs.com/ram-audio-files/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in

CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937)

Knowledge is power.  Educate yourselves.

This entry was posted on Saturday, August 22nd, 2009 at 6:25 am and is filed under IRS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment