17
Jul

July 13, 2010 Lindsey Springer Update from Jeanie Springer

   Posted by: BobMcNeil   in IRS

Bob
Here is the latest update from Lindsey Springer, submitted by his wife, Jeanie.

The weak legal arguments by the Department of Justice and the perversion of due process by the Courts becomes clearer every day.

In my opinion, no American citizen should EVER be subjected to this kind of treatment from the Government.

Personally, I’m going to send some money to Lindsey’s family to help defray the cost of his appeal.  Let conscience be your guide when considering the same.

In freedom,

Robert A. McNeil

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From: Lindsey Springer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:57 PM
To: lindsey springer
Subject: Lindsey Springer Email Update

Sorry it has been such a long time for an update but there hasn’t been very much news. I have been extremely busy working and haven’t had very much verbal contact with Lindsey. Lindsey was moved to a Federal Transfer center in Oklahoma City and has been “left” there for almost 2 months now. He gets only 300 minutes of phone use a month for family and friends. In order to call his attorney he must put in written requests which take up to a week or more to get back. He has been using his “family & friends” minutes to call his attorney. He wanted me to send out this email that he hand wrote and mailed to me, so I am doing what he has asked me to do.

Jeanie Springer

Email From Lindsey Springer:

Thank you for paying attention to my cases at the 10th Circuit. I hope you realize by now that some people wish for me not to succeed in any of my appeals.

I pray for them.

I have been trying to understand how the tax division thought a tax return and a Form 1040 are to be considered exclusive of one another. I have been thinking maybe I am wrong about what a return is.

Title 26, Sections 6102 & 6103 along with CFR 601.1040 and 1.6012 direct persons required to deliver a return to the District director or use Form 1040 “prescribed” by the Secretary. See Title 26, Section 6011.

When the Secretary of Treasury is defining “last known address” at 301, they describe an example of how this last known address works and that in the example they say “The address on a 1999 Form 1040 U.S. individual income tax return..”

I do not think the DOJ’s claim a return and a Form 1040 are not the same will go anywhere.

Being in prison is very difficult. I am doing what I can and hope to win a reversal or at minimum a new trial. I cannot elaborate on other issues at this time until they are ready. With one exception, I always go back to the undisputed fact that there are no Internal Revenue Districts between 2000 to present, yet I was charged with not delivering a Form 1040 to the place the law required.

Anyway, thank you for your continued prayers for those of you in agreement with me. We have come a long way and we need to get this right.

Please continue to consider my family and my needs during this time. I pray for God’s speed daily. I have no doubt you will be blessed.

I can still receive support at:

Lindsey Springer
5147 S. Harvard Ave #116
Tulsa, OK 74135

I can also receive Paypal at: [email protected] or [email protected] . Both of my email addresses are linked to my Paypal account.

I am greatly humbled.

Lindsey Springer

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in

CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937)

Knowledge is power.  Educate yourselves.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Saturday, July 17th, 2010 at 10:14 am and is filed under IRS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment