I would like to begin this blog by giving thanks to a merciful God for His guidance and protection as we walk this perilous path to restore the Rule of Law in America. It is my strong and unshakeable faith in Him that removes all fear from my mind….my heart….and my soul.

I would also like to call your attention to the recently revised text on the “Home” page of this website. It provides a comprehensive overview of the battle I am, and the other Plaintiffs are, currently fighting, and I encourage each of you to read it and share the website link on all your social media outlets.

Next, I would like to say to those Government officials who are monitoring this website (and, I know you are) that neither I, nor Michael Ellis, have any personal animus toward any of you. We are merely ordinary Americans with specific knowledge, skills and experience who are exercising our First Amendment right, in accordance with Court rules, to assist other Americans whose lives have been destroyed by the IRS’ institutionalized record falsification scheme. This continues to be a hard-fought battle as we struggle against those of you who would deny the Plaintiffs their Constitutional right to Due Process by dismissing their cases with a wave of your hand. Please rest assured those cases will be appealed.

Finally, on August 15, 2016, in 16-CV-1053 Crumpacker v. Ciraolo-Klepper, et al., Attorney General Loretta Lynch, through her associates Channing Phillips, Caroline Ciraolo-Klepper and Ryan O. McMonagle, prayed for the following relief: “That the Court, pursuant to 26 USC §7402 and 28 USC §1651 enter a permanent injunction barring Michael B. Ellis, Robert McNeil and Mark Crumpacker, from assisting in filing, or encouraging others to file, any further civil actions in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, without obtaining prior leave from the court…..“. [Page 15 at E.]

In light of all that has occurred in the adjudication of these cases, Michael and I would like to recognize and thank each of the judges who have shown the proper honor, respect, and restraint, by not sanctioning or enjoining us from assisting those in need. To you, we extend our heartfelt gratitude.

Our simple request to all parties in this battle is this: Please abide by the Oath you took when you chose to become a “public servant”.

Now, I ask this question to the following Officials with whom we have interacted, to date:

* Caroline Ciraolo-Klepper, DoJ Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
* Channing D. Phillips, U.S. Attorney General for D.C.
* Bruce Ellison, DoJ Trial Attorney, Tax Division
* Ryan O. McMonagle, DoJ Trial Attorney, Tax Division
* Michael J. Huangs, DoJ Attorney, Tax Division, Appellate Section
* Melissa Briggs, DoJ Attorney, Tax Division, Appellate Section
* Curtis C. Pett, DoJ Attorney, Tax Division, Appellate Section
* Senior Judge Ellen S. Huvelle, U.S. District Court for D.C.
* Senior Judge Rosemary M. Collyer, U.S. District Court for D.C.
* Judge Amy Berman Jackson, U.S. District Court for D.C.
* Judge Christopher R. Cooper, U.S. District Court for D.C.
* Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, U.S. District Court for D.C.
* Judge Tanya S. Chukan, U.S. District Court for D.C.
* Judge James E. Boasberg, U.S. District Court for D.C.
* Judge Padmanabhan Srinivasan, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

“You know there is no lawful defense of the layered fraud program IRS is operating against your fellow Americans.  Why do you commit misprision/crime yourself, destroying your own integrity to support a criminal enterprise?”

I eagerly await your answer.

In the waning days of 2016 and into the first days of 2017, Michael and I continued to work long hours into the night, on holidays, and through the weekends to file new cases and meet deadlines for filing pleadings in the active ones.

We do this for these reasons:

> To enjoin the IRS’ record falsification scheme that has destroyed the lives of millions of innocent Americans by garnishing their wages, issuing liens and levies, and seizing their property.
> To enjoin the Department of Justice (DoJ) from concealing the exculpatory evidence of this crime from Grand and Petit Juries and substituting supposed “certified” documents to indict, prosecute and convict innocent Americans of tax evasion and willful failure to file tax returns.
> To enjoin the Federal judges from fraudulently misrepresenting the claims in Plaintiffs’ cases, committing multiple felonies by colluding with the DoJ to conceal exculpatory evidence of the underlying felony record falsification scheme, and sentencing innocent Americans to years in prison for crimes they did not, and could not, commit.
> To restore the Rule of Law in America to allow “We the People”, for the first time in more than 100 years, to live at the level of freedom and prosperity intended by the Founding Fathers.

This blog post contains information on the following topics:

A. Status of Cases
B. Judge Cooper Falls in Line
C. Harold R. Stanley Criminal Case
D. New Case Filed
E. Rule 20 Motion for Permissive Joinder
F. Talkshoe Interview with Carl Weston and Rod Class
G. Donations

A. Status of Cases

To date, we have filed, or assisted in the filing of, thirteen (13) cases in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.  Some are now in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit:

01 14-CV-471  Ellis v. Commissioner, et al.  (Dismissed; Appealed; Dismissed; Need Funds for Supreme Court Petition)
02 16-5233  McNeil v. Commissioner, et al.  (Active; Dismissed in District Court; U.S. Court of Appeals)
03 16-5308  DePolo v. Ciraolo-Klepper, et al.  (Active; Dismissed in District Court; U.S. Court of Appeals)
04 16-5219  Ellis v. Jarvis, et al.  (Active; Dismissed in District Court; U.S. Court of Appeals)
05 16-CV-420  Dwaileebe v. Martineau, et al.  (Active; Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper; Dismissed December 31, 2016)
06 16-5214  Ellis v. Langer, et al.  (Active; Dismissed in District Court; U.S. Court of Appeals)
07 16-CV-1053  Crumpacker v. Ciraolo-Klepper, et al.  (Active; CounterClaim Filed by USA; Answer and CrossCounterClaim Filed by Crumpacker/Ellis/McNeil; Reassigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper; Dismissed December 31, 2016)
08 16-CV-1384  Morris v. McMonagle, et al.  (Active; Reassigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper; Dismissed on December 31, 2016)
09 16-CV-1458  McGarvin v. McMonagle, et al.  (Active; Reassigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper; Dismissed on December 31, 2016)
10 16-CV-1768  Podgorny v. McMonagle, et al.  (Active; Reassigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper; Dismissed on December 31, 2016)
11 16-CV-2089  Norma DeOrio v. Ciraolo-Klepper, et al.  (Active; Filed in District Court for D.C. on October 17, 2016; Reassigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper; Dismissed on December 31, 2016)
12 16-CV-2313  Ellis & McNeil v Jackson, Cooper, et al.  (Active; Filed in District Court for D.C. on November 18, 2016; Assigned to Judge Judge Emmet G. Sullivan)
13 17-CV-00022 Stanley, et al. v. Lynch, et al. (Active; Filed in District Court for D.C. on January 4, 2017; Assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan)

Cases in the queue:

Case #14 17-CV-____ Ford v. Ciraolo-Klepper, et al. is scheduled to be filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California – Fresno Division on Tuesday, January 10, 2017.

Case #15 17-CV-____ Keith DeOrio, M.D. v. Currently Unnamed Defendants – Declarations have been created and reviewed by the Plaintiff and the Original Complaint is currently being drafted.

To give you an idea what is involved in filing and advancing these cases through the judicial system, I have prepared an Excel spreadsheet of all activity since August 2015, when I filed my case.  Click the links below and take a few moments to grasp the enormous tasks that Michael, I and the other courageous Plaintiffs have accomplished.  For your convenience, I have sorted the spreadsheet two ways:

By case number:  http://bit.ly/2jh22L6

By the date the documents were filed:  http://bit.ly/2iemqLa

B. Judge Cooper Falls in Line

As I reported in my last blog, each response by the Department of Justice attorneys and the District Court judges, reveals another layer of fraud and judicial misconduct.

Open the spreadsheet sorted by case number , and scroll to Case No. 7 in Column A.  There, you will see that Mark Crumpacker’s Original Complaint was filed on June 6, 2016, assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan and given Case No. 1:16-cv-1053 (TSC).  That document is styled “ORIGINAL COMPLAINT with Declaration and Evidence Appended and MOTION TO CERTIFY and CONSOLIDATE CLASS ACTION”.

On August 15, 2016, the DoJ filed an “Answer and Counterclaim” , naming Crumpacker, Ellis and McNeil as Defendants.  In other words, the Government is now counter-suing the three of us and attempting to enjoin (stop) Michael and me from assisting Plaintiffs in filing any more cases.

On September 12, 2016, Michael filed our “Answer and Cross-CounterClaim”.

On September 27, 2016, the case was reassigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper.

On October 3, 2016, the DoJ filed a “Notice of Related Cases and Reassignment to Judge Christopher R. Cooper” for 16-CV-1384  Morris v. McMonagle, et al., 16-CV-1458  McGarvin v. McMonagle, et al., and 16-CV-1768  Podgorny v. McMonagle, et al.  We later learned that this decision was made in secret and without notice by the District Court’s Calendar and Case Management Committee.  Dwaileebe v. Martineau, et al. (16-CV-420) had already been assigned to Judge Cooper, so, now, five (5) cases had been assigned to him.

On October 12, 2016, each of the five (5) plaintiffs filed an “Objection to Consolidation Without Certification and Motion to Recuse Judge Christopher R. Cooper”, a “Revised Motion for Summary Judgment”, and a “Motion to Certify Class and Appoint Counsel”.

On October 21, 2016, Judge Cooper issued a “Consolidation and Case Management Order” .  In this Order, Judge Cooper DENIED the “Objection to Consolidation Without Certification and Motion to Recuse Judge Christopher R. Cooper”.  The Order also DENIED the “Motion to Sua Sponte Sanction DoJ Attorneys” in Dwaileebe v. Martineau, et al. (16-CV-420).  Most shocking, however, is the final paragraph in which Judge Cooper states “It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Counterclaim Defendants in Crumpacker, Case No. 16-1053 – Michael Ellis, Robert McNeil, and Mark Crumpacker – shall file either an Answer or a dispositive motion with respect to those counterclaims on or before November 18, 2016, on the Crumpacker docket only.”

The problem is this.  Judge Cooper ordered us to file an answer to the Government’s counterclaim by November 18, 2016, but, we had already done so on September 12, 2016.  I sent a letter to the U.S. District Court Clerk’s office requesting a copy of the Crumpacker docket sheet and, when I received it, our Answer was missing.  I then called the Clerk’s office to inquire about it and was told that all documents had been transferred from Judge Chutkan’s chambers to Judge Cooper’s chambers and that’s where our “Answer and Cross-Counterclaim” was then. It was then that we realized that Judge Cooper was withholding documents to keep them from being entered into the record.

Then, on Saturday, December 31, 2016, without ever entering our “Answer and Cross-Counterclaim” on the docket, and, therefore, never considering it, Judge Cooper issued a one-sentence “ORDER Granting the DoJ’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction” .

On the same day, Judge Cooper also issued an identical one-sentence “ORDER Granting the DoJ’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction” in 16-CV-420 Dwaileebe v. Martineau, et al., 16-CV-1384  Morris v. McMonagle, et al., 16-CV-1458  McGarvin v. McMonagle, et al., 16-CV-1768  Podgorny v. McMonagle, et al., and 16-CV-2089  Norma DeOrio v. Ciraolo-Klepper, et al.

It is obvious that Judge Cooper is doing what he was tasked to do by Judge Amy Berman Jackson and the Calendar and Case Management Committee…. to summarily dismiss each case for lack of jurisdiction…. most likely, and erroneously, citing the Anti-Injunction Act as the reason.

These instances of judicial misconduct are what spurred Michael and I to file our case – 16-CV-2313  Ellis and McNeil v. Jackson, Cooper, et al. in which we are suing Judge Amy Berman Jackson, Judge Christopher R. Cooper, Judge Padmanabhan Srinivasan, DoJ Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General – Tax Division – Caroline Ciraolo-Klepper, and DoJ Trial Attorney Ryan O’Connor McMonagle in their personal capacities, and IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and two (2) Unknown-named IRS/DoJ attorneys, in their official capacities, for committing Misprision of Felony (a violation of 18 U.S.C. §4), Conspiracies to Defraud the United States (a violation of 18 U.S.C. §371) and Obstruction of the Due Administration of Justice (a violation of 18 U.S.C. §1503).

That case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on November 18, 2016 and assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.

C. Harold R. Stanley Criminal Case

In my December 6, 2016 blog, I reported that Harold Stanley’s “Notice of Appeal” was perfected in the U.S. District Court, which removed that case from the Court’s jurisdiction and sent it to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis, Missouri.  Therefore, the “Rule 33 Motion for New Trial” is no longer the correct document to file.  So, Michael and I revised that document into what is now styled as “Motion for Summary Reversal Based on Newly Discovered Evidence & Motion to Set Immediate Hearing”, which proves he was convicted based on fraudulent documents created by the IRS.

You can read the PDF version of the motion (160 pages w/Exhibits – 11.6MB) here: http://bit.ly/2fYpDlx

Harold’s wife, Lorane, mailed this Motion to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals on December 5, 2016 to arrive in the Clerk’s office by noon on December 6th.  The PACER docket sheet indicates it was filed on December 9, 2016.

On December 14, 2016,  the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals DENIED Harold’s motion for summary reversal with one short sentence: “Appellant’s motion for summary reversal is denied.”

You can read the PDF version of the Court’s ORDER (1 page – 24KB) here: http://bit.ly/2iMk0Uz

D. New Case Filed

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals’ terse DENIAL of Harold’s “Motion for Summary Reversal” prompted Michael and I to prepare a new case, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The Original Complaint, styled “17-CV-00022 Stanley, et al. v. Lynch, et al.” and signed by Harold’s wife, Ellen Lorane Stanley (who has power of attorney to sign on his behalf), Michael B. Ellis, and Robert A. McNeil, as Co-Plaintiffs, was mailed to Washington, D.C. on Tuesday, January 3, 2017, filed on January 4, 2017 and assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. I received the stamped Summonses from the Clerk’s office on January 9, 2017 and mailed them, and the Original Complaint, to the Defendants on the same day, to arrive on January 10, 2017.

We are suing John Koskinen, IRS Commissioner, Loretta Lynch, U.S. Attorney General, and Barack H. Obama….in personal capacity.

The first four (4) paragraphs read, as follows:

“Defendant Koskinen is leading, under Defendant Obama’s oversight and with Defendant Lynch’s full knowledge and protection, a Government record falsification program like none in the history of the United States.

Victims of the program have filed multiple lawsuits complaining that despite IRS concessions it has no actual authority to compel filing of income tax returns, IRS conceals that lack of authority when dealing with those it labels “non-filers” by fabricating layered government records to reflect IRS’ pretended preparation of “substitute income tax returns” (“SFRs”). But victims have discovered no such thing exists.

Your Plaintiffs present herein irrefutable Government-supplied proof that Mr. Koskinen’s associates are systematically falsifying records to enforce the income tax, that Ms. Lynch and her associates are knowingly using IRS-falsified documents to justify forfeitures and criminal prosecutions, and that she is concealing evidence of the scheme’s existence from grand jurors, whose primary function is to protect Americans from crimes committed by our Government.

Moreover, during the past four years under Defendant Obama’s oversight, his direct subordinate Lynch has authorized commission of repeated acts of misprision during civil litigation by victims in U.S. Courts, to prevent adjudication of their victims’ cases seeking to terminate the IRS program, and she is now attacking those who respectfully seek judicial redress from the scheme.”

This is the most powerful case filed to date and the Government-supplied evidence contained therein is incontrovertible. Therefore, this case is the one we will ask millions of Americans to join in a class action.

E. Rule 20 Motion for Permissive Joinder

To that end, Michael is putting the finishing touches on a Rule 20 “Motion for Permissive Joinder”

By its plain language, Rule 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “permits permissive joinder of parties in cases when multiple victims’ claims arise out of the same events and involve the same legal questions. The Rule encourages the consolidation of lawsuits because it reduces the court’s workload and expedites the adjudication of rights. It also seeks to avoid inconsistent judgments for lawsuits resulting from the same injury. Consolidating cases that are based on similar facts, parties or circumstances helps to accomplish all three goals.”

In a future blog, I will provide further information about the process for you to complete the “Motion for Permissive Joinder”, should you choose to become a Co-Plaintiff. I can tell you now that there is a long line of people anxious to join the case, and that line will grow longer with each passing day. And, by the way, there is no filing fee as there would be if you opened a new case in Court, so, this is the perfect opportunity for you to take a stand and participate in the effort to restore the Rule of Law in America.

Please stay tuned.

F. Talkshoe Interview with Carl Weston and Rod Class

Harold Stanley was a follower of Carl Weston and Rod Class, each of whom portray themselves to be a “Private Attorney General”. Rod also describes himself as a “14th Amendment section 4 Constitutional Bounty Hunter”.

On September 27, 2016, Rod was instrumental in filing a claim in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, as a “6th Amendment Agent” for Harold . http://bit.ly/2j3ubaD

As you all know, Harold was sentenced to 5 years in prison on November 16, 2016 and immediately taken into custody.

On December 15, 2016, Carl contacted me and invited Michael and I to appear as guests on his, and Rod’s, Talkshoe program, which we did on Friday, December 23rd. On that program we discussed the IRS’ institutionalized record falsification scheme, Harold’s case, as well as the other cases in which we are providing assistance.

Since our appearance, it is my understanding that Carl and Rod are no longer involved in Harold’s case, which leaves only me and Michael working on his behalf.

So, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify a statement a caller on another Talkshoe program made saying that we have “teamed up” with Carl Weston and Rod Class on the Harold Stanley case.  We have not.

G. Donations

I would like to thank all of you who responded to my December 6th request for donations to restore the rule of law in America.  Donations came in from New Hampshire, New York, South Carolina, Nevada, Montana and Alabama, and I appreciate your generosity very much.

For the period October 31 thru December 31, 2016, I received donations of $3,650.00, but spent $4,218.57, leaving a deficit of <$568.57>, which is a significant decrease in the deficit reported in my December 6th blog.

Here is a link to the Excel spreadsheet detailing the donations and expenditures through December 31, 2016:  http://bit.ly/2i8zPaV

Of course, with the new year came additional expenses for printer paper, toner cartridges, miscellaneous expenses, filing fees and postage. For the period January 1 thru 9, 2017, those expenses amounted to $642.67. With no 2017 donations yet, the deficit stands at <$642.67>.  This means that the 2016 carryover of <$568.57> plus the 2017 deficit at January 9, 2017 of <$642.67> brings the current, cumulative deficit to <$1,211.24>.

Here is a link to the Excel spreadsheet detailing the donations and expenditures from January 1 thru January 9, 2017:  http://bit.ly/2idiz42

With all the active civil cases in various stages of development, plus the Harold Stanley criminal case, our efforts are ongoing.  For Michael and me, this is a labor of love and we do not charge one penny for our assistance, but, time is an irreplaceable asset and our knowledge and experience provides value to the Plaintiffs, and, if they prevail in the Courts, will provide liberty and prosperity to ALL Americans at the level our ancestors enjoyed.

So, I continue to humbly ask each of you to search your heart, and pocketbook, and make a monetary donation to the cause of liberty.  No amount is too small or great, and will be appreciated more than you know.

If you are so moved, please contact me here for instructions.

Conclusion

It is important for every American to understand that most of the loss of liberty we are experiencing began with laws passed by Congress over the last 100 years, and are being perpetuated today by the very people we elected to represent our interests, but who are failing to do so.

The Internal Revenue Code so voluminous and complex that few Americans actually know what is in it, or, more importantly, when they are violating a provision of it.  This provides the ideal environment for tyranny and oppression to flourish, the examples of which we present in these cases.

“We the People” will never be truly free until both the corporate and individual income taxes are eliminated and the 16th Amendment to the Constitution is repealed.  My case, and the others, clear the way for those events to happen.

Should we prevail, it will mean the end of the suffering experienced by millions of so-called “non-filers” at the hands of the IRS.  It will also mean the door is open for millions of Americans to participate, without fear of harm, in the coming “21st Century American Revolution“, which is a good, old-fashioned tax revolt.

We are the rightful masters of ALL levels of government, and we can put this out-of-control Federal government back into its Constitutional box by simply defunding it and, in the process, creating a smaller, more efficient government built on the solid, everlasting foundation of the Constitution, sound accounting principles, and economic law.

Please continue to educate yourselves about the fraud being committed every day by the IRS, Department of Justice, and the Courts in the enforcement of the income tax, and spread this website to all of your social media outlets.

Do it so you, your family, and future generations of Americans can begin to live at the level of liberty and prosperity the Founding Fathers intended.

Thank you.

In liberty,

Bob McNeil
21st Century American Revolutionary
Founder/President – American Citizen Party

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 10th, 2017 at 9:02 pm and is filed under 115-cv-01288, 16-5233 Appeal, IRS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment