23
Feb

February 24, 2018 – Case Update

   Posted by: BobMcNeil   in IRS

With multiple cases in various stages of development, I have fallen behind in my blog updates. But, I am slowly catching up. So, in this blog, I will provide an update on the following case:

17-00022 Stanley, et al v. Lynch, et al

In future blogs, I will update these cases:

17-1720 McNeil, et al v. Harvey, et al

17-2602 McNeil, et al v. Brown, et al

17-5191 U.S. Court of Appeals – Crumpacker v. Caroline Ciraolo-Klepper, et al

And, of course, at the first opportunity, I will provide an update reporting the outcome of our March 1, 2018 Contempt of Court hearing in Washington, D.C.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Case Update

17-00022 Stanley, et al v. Lynch, et al

See Docket Sheet

The Original Complaint in this case was filed on January 4, 2017 and names the following individuals as Defendants, sued in “personal capacity”:

* Loretta Lynch (former United States Attorney General)
* John Koskinen (former Commissioner, IRS)
* Barack H. Obama (former President of the United States)

On that same date, we filed a Notice of Related Cases, disclosing to the Court that this case was related to 16-2313 Ellis, et al v. Jackson, et al.

The First Amended Complaint was filed on January 23, 2017.

NOTE: This case was consolidated with Case 16-2313 Ellis, et al v. Jackson, et al on April 12, 2017.

The Plaintiffs in Case #17-00022 are Harold R. Stanley, Michael B. Ellis and Robert A. McNeil, who are joined by eleven (11) Co-Plaintiffs who each filed a “Motion for Permissive Joinder“, as permitted under Rule 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By its plain language, “Rule 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits permissive joinder of parties in cases when multiple victims’ claims arise out of the same events and involve the same legal questions. The Rule encourages the consolidation of lawsuits because it reduces the court’s workload and expedites the adjudication of rights. It also seeks to avoid inconsistent judgments for lawsuits resulting from the same injury. Consolidating cases that are based on similar facts, parties or circumstances helps to accomplish all three goals.”

Harold Stanley is currently incarcerated in El Reno Federal Correctional Institution, located in El Reno, Oklahoma. Post-sentencing, it was discovered that his conviction was based on the same underlying felonious falsification of Government records used to defraud and damage Plaintiffs Ellis, McNeil, and the eleven (11) Co-Plaintiffs.

The Complaint begins: “Defendant Koskinen is leading, under Defendant Obama’s oversight and with Defendant Lynch’s full knowledge and protection, a Government record falsification program like none in the history of the United States.”

“Victims of the program have filed multiple lawsuits complaining that despite IRS concessions it has no actual authority to compel filing of income tax returns, IRS conceals that lack of authority by fabricating layered government records to reflect IRS’ pretended preparation of “substitute income tax returns” (“SFRs”). No such thing exists in reality.”

“Plaintiffs present herein irrefutable Government-supplied proof that Mr. Koskinen’s associates are systematically falsifying records to enforce the income tax, that Ms. Lynch and her associates are knowingly using IRS-falsified documents to justify forfeitures and criminal prosecutions, and that she is concealing evidence of the scheme’s existence from grand jurors, whose primary function is to protect Americans from crimes committed by our Government.”

“Moreover, during the past four years under Defendant Obama’s oversight, his direct subordinate Lynch has authorized commission of repeated acts of misprision during civil litigation by victims in U.S. Courts, to prevent adjudication of their victims’ cases seeking to terminate the program.”

“In sum, as explained fully below and in the attached irrefutable documentation, the Defendant attorneys are obstructing justice, defrauding the United States and individual Americans, blocking victims’ access to meaningful judicial redress by refusing to mention victims’ actual complaint allegation, while incarcerating victims and stealing their property based on falsified records fabricated by Mr. Koskinen and his associates, which records are used with full knowledge of their fraudulent nature by both subordinates of Mr. Obama.”

“Accordingly, Plaintiffs seek determination of this core question:

Are the Defendants personally liable for commission by their subordinates of acts damaging Plaintiffs during the past four years of Mr. Obama’s oversight, including: (a.) the ongoing operation by Mr. Koskinen of the concealed, institutionalized IRS record falsification program, (b.) the concealment by Defendant Lynch from grand juries investigating “income tax crimes” the exculpatory evidence proving existence of the felonious IRS scheme, and (c.) multiple acts of misprision committed by Lynch-directed attorneys during the four years victims have been respectfully but pointedly seeking redress from Courts to terminate the program?”

[RAM Note: Misprision of felony is proscribed by Congress and codified at 18 U.S.C. §4. Conspiracies to defraud the United States are proscribed at 18 U.S.C. §371. Obstruction of the due administration of justice is proscribed at 18 U.S.C. §1503.]

Further in the Complaint, we write: “The Anti-Injunction Act (AIA) has no application to this case. As conclusive proof of that legal fact, Plaintiffs discovered that before Mr. Koskinen claims any amount of “income tax” is owed by a so-called “non-filer” (as IRS incorrectly labels Plaintiffs) his associates FIRST falsify IRS computer records concerning victims to reflect IRS’ pretended preparation of “substitute income tax returns” (SFRs) on claimed dates. Hence, the outcome of this case cannot change Plaintiffs’ future “income tax” liability, because they have none, absent white-collar computer fraud committed and concealed by Mr. Koskinen’s associates. Accordingly, the AIA is irrelevant to the outcome of this cause, since Plaintiffs have no lawful liability to pay the exaction.”

The case was originally assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, who, subsequently referred it to Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey for full case management. On October 31, 2017, however, the case was reassigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly and Judge Sullivan was no longer assigned to the case, but, Magistrate Harvey remained assigned to the case.

And, on November 1, 2017, Magistrate Harvey issued a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that Judge Kelly GRANT the DoJ’s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation on November 15, 2017.

Continuing his quest to dismiss the case, Magistrate Harvey then DENIED the twelfth (12) Co-Plaintiff to file his Rule 20 “Motion for Permissive Joinder”.

Finally, on February 13, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Notice to the Court of the March 16, 2018 hearing in Case 17-00187 U.S.A. v. Ford. This case, filed in the Eastern District of California – Fresno seeks to reduce the IRS’ $190,854.91 assessment, for 2003 taxes, to a judgment, in order to seize the assets of 80 year-old Ms. Ford, including her home. The March 16th hearing is significant because, for the first time in any Court, the Magistrate (Erica P. Grosjean) ordered the Department of Justice attorney to produce the Substitute Income Tax Returns (SFRs) shown in Ms. Ford’s Individual Master File (IMF) records. As you can imagine the DoJ attorney, Jonathan M. Hauck, is trying everything possible to keep from supplying the SFRs because he knows they don’t exist, and he would have to admit that they don’t.

So, he has decided to go behind Magistrate Grosjean’s back and file a Motion for Summary Judgment directly with District Court Judge Dale A. Drozd. The outcome of the March 16th hearing should be interesting.

In this case, since the Plaintiffs filed their February 13, 2018 Notice, there have been no further pleadings filed by the DoJ or any more Orders issued by Magistrate Harvey. We suspect they are awaiting the outcome of our March 1st contempt of court hearing and Magistrate Grosjean’s hearing on March 16th.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Please continue to read my blogs and share them on all of your social media platforms. By doing so, you will help shine a beacon of light into the darkness and expose one of the greatest scams in history.

Your future, your family’s future, and the future of following generations of Americans depends on it.

Thank you for subscribing to this website. All this is for you.

In liberty,

Bob McNeil
2018 U.S. Senate Candidate from Texas
21st Century American Revolutionary
Founder/President – American Citizen Party

This entry was posted on Friday, February 23rd, 2018 at 9:19 pm and is filed under IRS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment